If freedom of speech is absolute, how come it's not applied for private spaces and for the Internet?
09.06.2025 05:37

That’s what it is. You have no right to use other people’s stuff. If people let you use their stuff, they can tell you how you can use it, and they can tell you to stop using it any time they want.
You have freedom of speech. If I loan you my computer, I can tell you not to use it for certain things, because it’s mine, you have no right to use it, and if I give you permission to use it I can tell you what you can and can’t do with it.
Child pornography
False advertising
Terroristic threats
Conspiracy
Where are the gay people in India?
And much, much more.
Freedom of speech does not apply to:
Threats of violence
Fraud
HIPAA violations
Revealing classified information
What is the sum of X+XX+XXX+XXXX?
You have freedom to travel. If I loan you my car, I can tell you not to take it out of town, because it’s mine, you have no right to use it, and if I give you permission to use it I can tell you what you can and can’t do with it.
Revenge porn
No freedom is absolute.
Do liberals realise that God, who is much more powerful than them, is on the side of Trump?
If you’re wondering why free speech doesn’t apply to the internet, it’s because you have no right to use other people’s stuff for free.
Perjury
Trade secrets
What do you think about a sister's love?
Insurrection
Insider trading